Physical, compliance, and capital-execution pressure reflected in the blended headline composite.
Munimetric Water System Profile
City of Jackson, MS
Drinking Water Infrastructure Profile
City of Jackson, MS, Mississippi — Munimetric water system profile with MISI stress score, active compliance signals, infrastructure context, and fiscal pressure indicators. This profile highlights what is happening and why it matters using water-system, fiscal, capital, and signal context.
City of Jackson, MS has a MISI infrastructure stress score of 47.5/100 in the Fragile band as of 2026-06-16. Public records show surface-water sourcing, PFAS monitoring context, lead and copper compliance context and approximately 189,673 residents served. Updated May 2026.
Headline score
47.5
97% confidence · cohort Community · 100k–250k · Surface.
Current headline composite
Component of current headline composite
Affordability, demand-base, and parent-government fiscal pressure reflected in the blended headline composite.
Staleness, disclosure freshness, and reporting-visibility effects reflected in the blended headline composite.
Monitoring context stored
Water Quality & Supply Context
Public-record context for this system. Stored monitoring and compliance records only. Does not change MISI.
Tier 1 profile guide
How to interpret City of Jackson, MS
Plain-language summary
City of Jackson, MS is part of the selected Tier 1 profile set. This page is designed to quickly explain what the MISI headline composite means here. In v0.1.2, the headline composite remains a blended structural stress measure rather than a pure physical-condition index. A frozen national reference and a 50 percent single-factor cap reduce the dominance of near-universal and very rare factors, while the component bars continue to separate infrastructure, socioeconomic, and observability readings.
Why this page stands out
- Current MISI is 47.5 in the fragile band as of Jun 16, 2026.
- 97% confidence and 12 tracked structural signals support interpretation quality.
- Related market links are prioritized for same-state and same-risk-context comparisons.
What to do next
- Read the executive interpretation first to understand why the market is in its current band.
- Compare this profile with related systems to validate whether stress patterns are local or systemic.
- Open Mississippi state context to see how this market fits the statewide posture.
Executive context
What the Data Suggests
City of Jackson, MS's drinking-water system serves about 189,673 residents, making it a mid-size system within the coverage universe. The current reading places the system in a zone of moderate-to-elevated stress that goes beyond normal operating variation.
The score is being driven mainly by Capex Pressure, which is at the top of its range in the model, with Operational Stress adding another heavy layer of pressure. That combination suggests strain is showing up across core system functions, not just one isolated dimension.
8 active stress signals are attached to this system, including 4 at high severity. That signal mix points to a system where several warning indicators are firing at once, not just one extreme outlier.
Within Community · 100k–250k · Surface, this system ranks around the 97th percentile on measured stress, placing it near the top of peer-group stress.
Recent observations suggest the system has been relatively steady rather than sharply improving or deteriorating — the current picture looks more like persistent underlying pressure than a sudden shift.
This summary is based on structured, source-backed public data and is intended for research and monitoring only. It is not investment advice, a credit opinion, or municipal advisory guidance.
Analytical posture
Market Stress Analytics
Family Contribution
MISI family contributions for this market.
Peer Position
Where City of Jackson sits within its peer cohort.
Score History
Latest
47.5
Trend
+35.5
Observations
59
Unified Explainability
Structural indicators
Stress diagnostics
- Structural stress is currently driven by compliance-related escalation within recent monitoring activity.
- Affordability pressure is present, with declining real income affecting rate capacity.
- Liquidity conditions indicate moderate constraint.
- Additional monitoring signals reflect ongoing administrative and reporting strain.
- Some areas remain under active evaluation as coverage expands.
Signal timeline summary
No signal timeline history is stored for this profile.
Source observations
Completeness 0% · raw-file links remain policy-gated to authorized internal review workflows.
No source observations are stored on this profile.
Stress movement
Diagnostics
Diagnostics & Movement
Compact status for confidence, data coverage, disclosure freshness, and stored score movement. Detailed diagnostic history remains available below.
Confidence
97%
Confidence is mainly capped by document freshness.
Factor coverage
Complete
All tracked confidence factors are currently available.
Disclosure freshness
Not available
No attached disclosure document has a usable reference date.
Latest movement
flat 0.0
Compared with Jun 15, 2026.
Last material movement
-1.0
Recorded Jun 12, 2026.
History
59 observations stored
Latest stored observation Jun 16, 2026.
Show detailed diagnostic history
Expanded stress diagnostics
Open detailed contribution diagnostics
No detailed factor diagnostics are stored for this profile snapshot.
Confidence summary
Confidence is mainly capped by document freshness.
Gate high (option_b)
- score_confidence: high
- availability_score: high
- mapping_confidence: high
- freshness_score: high
- provenance_completeness: unknown
Missing factor coverage
No factor gaps are recorded on the latest stored score.
Disclosure freshness diagnostics
0 attached local documents · 0 structured facts
No attached disclosure document has a usable reference date.
Latest reference Not available · stale after Not available
Score movement
flat 0.0
Previous run Jun 15, 2026
Jun 16, 2026
Score 47.5 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Jun 15, 2026
Score 47.5 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Jun 14, 2026
Score 47.5 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Jun 12, 2026
Score 47.5 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run -1.0
Jun 11, 2026
Score 48.4 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Jun 8, 2026
Score 48.4 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Jun 2, 2026
Score 48.4 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Jun 1, 2026
Score 48.4 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
May 31, 2026
Score 48.4 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run -1.0
May 28, 2026
Score 49.4 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
May 26, 2026
Score 49.4 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
May 24, 2026
Score 49.4 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
May 22, 2026
Score 49.4 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
May 21, 2026
Score 49.4 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
May 19, 2026
Score 49.4 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
May 17, 2026
Score 49.4 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
May 10, 2026
Score 49.4 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
May 9, 2026
Score 49.4 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
May 8, 2026
Score 49.4 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
May 7, 2026
Score 49.4 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
May 6, 2026
Score 49.4 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
May 5, 2026
Score 49.4 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
May 4, 2026
Score 49.4 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
May 3, 2026
Score 49.4 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
May 2, 2026
Score 49.4 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
May 1, 2026
Score 49.4 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Apr 30, 2026
Score 49.4 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Apr 29, 2026
Score 49.4 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Apr 28, 2026
Score 49.4 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Apr 27, 2026
Score 49.4 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Apr 26, 2026
Score 49.4 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run -2.6
Apr 26, 2026
Score 52.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Apr 25, 2026
Score 52.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run 1.0
Apr 24, 2026
Score 51.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Apr 23, 2026
Score 51.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Apr 22, 2026
Score 51.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Apr 21, 2026
Score 51.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Apr 19, 2026
Score 51.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Apr 18, 2026
Score 51.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Apr 14, 2026
Score 51.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Apr 13, 2026
Score 51.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Apr 10, 2026
Score 51.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Apr 9, 2026
Score 51.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Apr 8, 2026
Score 51.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Apr 7, 2026
Score 51.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Apr 6, 2026
Score 51.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run 23.0
Apr 5, 2026
Score 28.0 in band watch. Confidence 84%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Apr 5, 2026
Score 28.0 in band watch. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Apr 4, 2026
Score 28.0 in band watch. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Apr 3, 2026
Score 28.0 in band watch. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Apr 3, 2026
Score 28.0 in band watch. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Apr 2, 2026
Score 28.0 in band watch. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run 4.0
Mar 29, 2026
Score 24.0 in band watch. Confidence 86%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Mar 25, 2026
Score 24.0 in band watch. Confidence 86%.
Delta vs prior run 12.0
Mar 24, 2026
Score 12.0 in band stable. Confidence 72%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Mar 22, 2026
Score 12.0 in band stable. Confidence 72%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Mar 21, 2026
Score 12.0 in band stable. Confidence 72%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Mar 20, 2026
Score 12.0 in band stable. Confidence 72%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Mar 18, 2026
Score 12.0 in band stable. Confidence 72%.
Trend and export
Full timeline review is available for paid workflows.
Extended layers
Advanced Profile Context
System
MS0250008
189,673 pop. served
Headline
47.5
Band: fragile
Methodology
vv0.1.2
As of Jun 16, 2026
Infrastructure Exposure
Drinking-water system snapshot
PWSID MS0250008 · population served 189,673 · source water surface_water
Violations 200 · enforcement actions 442
Wastewater and capital beta context
Wastewater links 0 · capital indicators 0 · SRF projects 11
Headline-score eligibility remains off by default unless mapping confidence is high and explicitly enabled.
Fiscal Pressure Metrics
City Of Jackson
Latest fiscal year 2022.
Parent-government fiscal context is shown here as a slower-moving governance overlay rather than a live operating signal.
Cross-system comparison
Open in Munex
Send this market’s score and active signals to the Munex canvas for scenario analysis, side-by-side comparison, and annotation.
Compare this system
Select peer systems and review side-by-side headline score, structural indicators, and signal timelines.
Export workflows
Use exports to move profile insights into monitoring and reporting workflows.
Data and report exports
Export workflows
Use the paid workflow controls above to run compare and export actions.
Source-linked panels
Source-backed panel
Scoring and signal state
Structured score contributions and public signal summaries, tracked with methodology version and peer context.
- Methodology version: v0.1.2
- As of date: 2026-06-16
- Signals in history: 12
Source-backed panel
Drinking-water identity and compliance
System identity, population served, violation history, enforcement actions, and boundary metadata.
- PWSID: MS0250008
- Snapshot date: Dec 31, 2025
- Violations: 200
- Enforcement actions: 442
Source-backed panel
Parent-government fiscal overlay
Organization-level fiscal metrics remain a separate overlay and feed Governance Risk in v1.
- Parent government: City Of Jackson
- Latest fiscal year: 2022
Source-backed panel
Wastewater and capital context
Wastewater remains beta-only in v1 unless mapping confidence is high and explicitly enabled.
- Wastewater links: 0
- Capital indicators: 0
- SRF projects: 11
- What is the Munimetric score for City of Jackson, MS?
- The current Munimetric Infrastructure Stress Index (MISI) score for City of Jackson, MS is shown at the top of this profile. MISI ranges from 0 to 100, where higher values indicate more structural stress across operational, capital, revenue, rate, and governance risk families. The score is deterministic, source-backed, and updated as new data becomes available.
- Does Munimetric rate current tap-water conditions for City of Jackson, MS?
- Munimetric is not a water quality testing service and does not make current-condition determinations. This profile tracks the structural conditions surrounding City of Jackson, MS's water system: compliance posture, financial pressure, infrastructure stress, and governance quality. For current water quality data, refer to the system's Consumer Confidence Report or contact the local water utility.
- Has City of Jackson, MS had a boil water advisory?
- Munimetric does not track real-time boil water advisories. For current advisory status, contact your local water utility or state drinking water program. This profile tracks the structural risk indicators and compliance history that may provide context around system reliability.
- Are lead pipes or corrosion risk a concern in City of Jackson, MS?
- Where EPA SDWA compliance data includes lead and copper rule monitoring, violations, or enforcement actions, that information feeds into the Operational Stress component of the MISI score. Specific lead service line counts, if available, are reflected in the detailed compliance context. Munimetric does not fabricate lead pipe data where public records are silent.
- Why might water rates be increasing in City of Jackson, MS?
- Rate pressure can stem from capital investment needs, declining customer base, revenue fragility, affordability constraints, or parent-government fiscal stress. The Rate Constraint and Revenue Fragility score families specifically measure these pressures where data is available.
- What does the MISI score mean for City of Jackson, MS?
- The score is a composite measure (0–100) of structural risk across five families: Operational Stress, Capex Pressure, Revenue Fragility, Rate Constraint, and Governance Risk. In v0.1.2, the headline composite remains a blended structural stress measure rather than a pure physical-condition index. A frozen national reference and a 50 percent single-factor cap reduce the dominance of near-universal and very rare factors, while the component bars continue to separate infrastructure, socioeconomic, and observability readings. It is deterministic and source-backed, not a credit score.
- What signals are active for City of Jackson, MS?
- Signals are tracked events such as compliance escalation, population decline, income erosion, utility data staleness, or parent-government fiscal stress. Active signals are shown above with severity, effective date, and confidence. They are structural monitoring indicators, not emergency alerts.
- Water infrastructure risk in Mississippi
- How Munimetric scores drinking water systems
- Compare water system profiles in the Screener
- Water infrastructure risk by state
- Track for City of Jackson, MS
- Water infrastructure research & guides
- Mississippi Track hub
- More Mississippi systems with similar stress and infrastructure context
About City of Jackson, MS
City of Jackson, MS is a community drinking-water system in Mississippi that Munimetric monitors for infrastructure stress. The current MISI score of 47.5 out of 100 places this system in the fragile stress band as of 2026-06-16. The MISI composite reflects five structural risk families: Operational Stress, Capex Pressure, Revenue Fragility, Rate Constraint, and Governance Risk. Higher scores indicate more structural stress.
Data is assembled from EPA SDWA compliance records, American Community Survey demographic and economic indicators, FEMA National Risk Index hazard exposure data, state-reported financial disclosures, and stored public-record water quality context where available. This system serves approximately 189,673 people. The system has 200 recorded compliance violations in the SDWA record. Munimetric does not fabricate data where public records are unavailable. This profile is for structural monitoring and research—not a current-condition determination or credit rating. Updated May 2026.
- What is the Munimetric score for City of Jackson, MS?
- The current Munimetric Infrastructure Stress Index (MISI) score for City of Jackson, MS is 47.5 out of 100, placing this system in the fragile stress band. MISI is a composite of five structural risk families. Higher values indicate more stress. The score is deterministic, source-backed, and updated as new data becomes available.
- Does City of Jackson, MS show signs of drinking-water infrastructure stress?
- Munimetric monitors structural stress indicators for City of Jackson, MS across operational conditions, capital needs, revenue stability, rate affordability, and governance quality. The current MISI score and active signals shown in this profile reflect the latest available evidence from EPA, ACS, FEMA NRI, and state financial disclosures.
- Does Munimetric rate current tap-water conditions for City of Jackson, MS?
- No. Munimetric is not a water testing service and does not make current-condition determinations. This profile tracks structural conditions: compliance posture, financial pressure, infrastructure stress, and governance quality. For current water quality testing results, consult the system's Consumer Confidence Report or contact the local water utility.
- Has City of Jackson, MS had a boil water advisory?
- Munimetric does not track real-time boil water advisories. For current advisory status, contact your local water utility or state drinking water program. This profile tracks structural risk indicators and compliance history that provide long-term context around system reliability.
- Are lead pipes or corrosion risk a concern in City of Jackson, MS?
- Where EPA SDWA compliance data includes lead and copper rule monitoring, violations, or enforcement actions, that information feeds into the Operational Stress component of the MISI score. Munimetric does not fabricate lead pipe data where public records are silent.
- Does Munimetric include PFAS monitoring context for City of Jackson, MS?
- Where stored public records include UCMR or contaminant-monitoring summaries, Munimetric displays PFAS monitoring context as public-record evidence. Missing PFAS summaries are treated as missing records, not as non-detections. This context does not change MISI by itself.
- What source-water context is available for City of Jackson, MS?
- Munimetric displays stored source-water and supply context where public drinking-water identity records are available. Source-water context helps explain treatment and supply exposure, but missing source records remain explicit rather than inferred.
- Why might water rates be increasing in City of Jackson, MS?
- Rate pressure can reflect capital investment needs, a declining customer base, revenue fragility, affordability constraints, or parent-government fiscal stress. The Rate Constraint and Revenue Fragility score families specifically measure these pressures where data is available from public financial disclosures.
- What does the MISI score mean for City of Jackson, MS?
- The MISI score (47.5/100) is a composite measure of structural risk across five families: Operational Stress, Capex Pressure, Revenue Fragility, Rate Constraint, and Governance Risk. The headline remains a blended structural stress composite rather than a pure physical-condition index. The current methodology also downweights factors that are nearly universal or very rare in the frozen national reference population, so one common contextual factor does not dominate the headline by itself. Higher scores indicate more structural stress. It is deterministic and source-backed, not a credit rating.
- U.S. water infrastructure stress monitoring homepage
- Water infrastructure risk in Mississippi
- How Munimetric scores drinking water systems
- Compare water system profiles in the Screener
- Water infrastructure risk by state
- Water infrastructure research & guides
- Munimetric analytical rankings
- Water Systems with Parent-Government Fiscal Stress
- Water Systems with Infrastructure Capital Gap Signals
- Systems with Compliance Escalation
- Largest Water Systems with Compliance Escalation
- Mississippi MISI stress-band comparison hub
- Mississippi water systems by population served
- Mississippi water systems by source-water context